Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Identifying And Assessing The Likely Risks Of Tort And Criminal Liability Arising From The Operations Of Business. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
4 pages in length. Manufacturing a product requires considerably more forethought than merely fashioning the item; rather, significant consideration must be give to extenuating circumstances that, if the product does not meet certain legal stipulations, serve to identify and assess the likely risks of tort and criminal liability arising from the operations of business. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCCompRisk.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
if the product does not meet certain legal stipulations, serve to identify and assess the likely risks of tort and criminal liability arising from the operations of business.
One such legal entity that addresses the issue of criminal liability is the tort of negligence, a defining mechanism that clearly identifies when, for example,
the product was carelessly manufactured so as not to function as promised or to harm the system upon which it was installed. What determines whether or not an individual
seeks legal compensation when negligence has occurred? Are there certain issues that openly sway ones decision as to take action? Clearly, several factors exist within the boundaries of
negligence that help determine if a client is going to sue, including the past/present relationship between client and manufacturer, how the manufacturer responds to the claim of negligence, as well
as the ethical nature of the situation. With a sue-happy country as the United States, microchip manufacturers cannot be too careful when it comes to claims of negligence. That
America has come to represent one of the most cluttered court systems in the world lends credence to the claim that no company is safe from a clients legal right
to sue. What is negligence, and why is it such a significant basis for judicial interjection? Clearly, a professional in any field upholds certain responsibilities when it comes
to the products his or her company manufactures, fundamentally avoiding to "breach by the defendant of a legal duty to take care not to damage the plaintiff or his property
and consequent damage from that breach" (Anonymous, no date). When this breach occurs, the manner by which the manufacturer handles the violation could mean the difference between an angry
...