Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Human Rights and the Modern State. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
An 8 page paper which examines whether or not human rights can truly serve as a means of legitimizing the modern state, referencing the work of Jurgen Habermas. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
8 pages (~225 words per page)
File: TG15_TGhumrimod.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
as room must be made for the influx of new players on the international stage. As the concept of the modern state continues to evolve, political scientists and historians
like Jurgen Habermas grapple with establishing the criteria that sufficiently defines it in the twenty-first century. With political oppression becoming an international problem as a result of questionable punishing
of global terrorism, the issue of human rights has been factored into what has become an increasingly complex political equation. Modern states can only be internationally accepted if they
are legitimate or lawful. Therefore, many theorists argue that this legitimacy can only be established through an incorporation of human rights policies. However, there are an equal number
of theorists who believe that human rights are not a requirement of the modern state by its citizens, but values imposed by other nations. The term state dates back to
Italian political thinker Niccolo Machiavelli, who used it as a way of describing a type of social structure that governs a particular country. Later, German sociologist Max Weber developed
the idea further, asserting that states were based essentially on one group dominating another, and that legitimacy was invariably established through violence. The rationale is that people who fear
the repercussions of breaking the law tend to be more obedient. Authority then becomes legitimate as a result of the combination of acceptance and complacence. Then, in the
twentieth century, the nation-state emerged, which is built on the foundation of nationalism (the commonality of shared country, language, and culture) and government. The legitimacy for a nation-state is
determined by the people the state is governing, and framed by their perceptions of what a state should be. Gradually, the term nation-state began to be replaced by the
...