Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on How Leaders From the Past Might View the War in Iraq. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 8 page paper examines the war in Iraq through the eyes of Elizabeth I, Alexander Hamilton and Benjamin Banneker. Bibliographic information is included about each of the individuals. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
8 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA550war.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
others claim that many lives are lost for nothing. Why is the U.S. in Iraq anyway? The answer is not clear and that is troubling for many people. At the
crux of the answer is the debate as to whether or not there were weapons of mass destruction or WMD hidden in Iraq. If the answer is yes, then some
say that the war is justified. However, if the answer is no, then the war is not justified. While that question goes largely unanswered, as there is debate on that
point, some suggest that there was WMD, but it was moved. There is no proof of course and the debate continues. It seems that neither side provides substantial proof. In
delving into this topic, it pays to look at great leaders of the past. What might a brave monarch like Elizabeth I say about the War in Iraq today? What
might Alexander Hamilton who advocated for the rights of the government contend in respect to what is presently going on in the Middle East? Of course, great statesmen and leaders
have valuable opinions, but the ideas of the common man are also worth taking into consideration. A man who lived in Hamilton and Jeffersons time by the name of Benjamin
Benneker will be discussed as well. Of course, he was a brilliant man, but he was not a politician, and that makes all the difference. In any case, what might
these three people who had each achieved much in their lives, think about what is happening today? Some have claimed that Alexander Hamilton was a Machiavellian leader. Hamilton was actually
a leader who did not have much faith in the people, and in essence, he was a lot like Machiavelli. Unlike Thomas Jefferson, for example, Hamilton never trusted the citizenry,
...