Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Hobbes, Locke And Montesquieu: Responding To And Building Upon Machiavellian Foundations. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
6 pages in length. Hobbes, Locke and Montesquieu are each in their own way responding to, but also building upon, the foundations laid by Machiavelli. To determine what sense, if any, these three theorists can be called Machiavellians is to first gain a greater insight to their respective philosophies. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCHobLocke.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
To determine what sense, if any, these three theorists can be called Machiavellians is to first gain a greater insight to their respective philosophies.
The words of pivotal political theorist Machiavelli, the sixteenth century philosopher who urged the separation of politics from moral and religious considerations, still characterizes contemporary American politics some
four hundred years after their utterance. Machiavellis political theories, which have made a significant contribution to the development of modern political thought, have survived the test of time and
continue to endure in the political structure of the twentieth century. According to Machiavelli, a successful and powerful government balances its strengths by
offsetting differing interests, while always taking into account public good. Additionally, a president who is worth his salt makes exceptional use of the political climate, much like Harry Truman
and Dwight D. Eisenhower did during their respective presidencies. Equally important as the removal of morality from politics is the elimination of religion, as well. This theory, which
is still valiantly fought for today, represents the fundamental democratic composition espoused by the United States Constitution. "It must be understood that a prince ... cannot observe all of
those virtues for which men are reputed good, because it is often necessary to act against mercy, against faith, against humanity, against frankness, against religion, in order to preserve the
state. Thus he must be disposed to change according as the winds of fortune and the alternations of circumstance dictate. As I have aleady said, he must stick
to the good so long as he can, but being compelled by necessity, he must be ready to take the way of evil...In all mens acts, and in those of
...