Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Hippocratic Oath. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
                                            
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3-page paper discusses whether or not the Hippocratic Oath encourages medical paternalism or patient autonomy; it finds that the Oath does encourage paternalism and suggests a way to begin revising it to encourage patient autonomy.  Bibliography lists 2 sources.
                                                
Page Count: 
                                                3 pages (~225 words per page)
                                            
 
                                            
                                                File: D0_HVHippo.rtf
                                            
                                            Buy This Term Paper »
                                          
                                             
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
                                                    
                                                
                                                    what theyve learned, and avoid unnecessary surgery (Hippocratic Oath-Modern Version, 2001).  While the Oath is administered routinely, physicians today are beginning to question its relevance, and whether it should  
                                                
                                                    be sworn to at all.  This essay considers the oath, whether it supports medical paternalism or patient autonomy; and if it does not support the latter, how it could  
                                                
                                                    be revised so it does. Discussion 	Most of the sources Ive found believe that the Oath is structured so as to support medical paternalism (the idea that the doctor knows  
                                                
                                                    best in all cases and is to be obeyed implicitly) rather than patient autonomy (the idea that the patient can make his own decisions regarding his treatment).  A look  
                                                
                                                    at the wording of the Oath makes it easy to see why this view has support; it is a view with which I concur. 	The Oath is worded so as  
                                                
                                                    to imbue the speaker with a great deal of power.  For example:  "If it is given me to save a life, all thanks.  But it may also  
                                                
                                                    be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty.  Above all, I must not play  
                                                
                                                    God" (Hippocratic Oath, 2001).  It seems to me that the wording leads the young physician directly into the trap he hopes to avoid:  playing God.  There is  
                                                
                                                    a degree of pomposity and gravity to the speech that is disturbing, as if the physician has been given some sort of divine revelation, not graduated from medical school.  
                                                
                                                    The Oath also says that the doctor must remember he is part of society, with "special obligations" to all people, including those who are healthy as well as those who  
                                                
                                                    ...