Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Hippies: 1960s and Today. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
An 8 page paper which compares and contrasts the hippies of the 1960s to the modern day hippies. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
8 pages (~225 words per page)
File: JR7_RAhippy.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
and social and civil and sexual changes and the counterculture of the hippies made clear note that many people were unhappy with the past and the world needed change. Today
there is a relatively new form of hippies, although hippies have been around since their arrival in the 1960s. Today they are generally called neo-hippies and they are just as
diverse as the hippies of decades ago. The following paper examines the hippies of yesterday and the hippies of today, discussing their diversity and examining spiritual foundations of the hippy
movements. Hippies: 1960s and Today It should first be noted that hippies are not all the same. The hippies from the 1960s and 70s could generally be seen
as a group of people who were cohesive but that is not truth either. While hippies generally could be recognized by long hair, particular styles of clothing, and their language,
they were hippies for different reasons and on different grounds. There were hippies who were lost and mentally confused, just joining with hippies because it seemed cool. They would not
necessarily possess any spiritual values and may well have only wanted to get stoned. They could have been runaway teens or young adults who were living off their parents money.
They could be simply irresponsible people who were looking for something exciting and fun. There were hippies who simply did not like the government and this could well have
been connected to communist beliefs or anarchy. They may not have possessed any spiritual values at all and were only concerned with going against the system for whatever reason. They
may have argued against the war in Vietnam because it was cool and anti-establishment, or they could have been arguing against the war in Vietnam because they really felt the
...