Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Herbst et al: "My Head Says Yes But My Heart Says No: Cognitive And Affective Attraction As A Function Of Similarity To The Ideal Self". Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
7 pages in length. The intrinsic connection between the ideal self (IS) and the interchangeable aspects of attraction and repulsion is, according to Herbst et al, what makes a person initially attracted to someone with his or her own similar traits but then ultimately come to reject those same similarities when the love interest surpasses their IS. My Head Says Yes But My Heart Says No: Cognitive And Affective Attraction As A Function Of Similarity To The Ideal Self delves into the cognitive and affective elements of attraction as they relate to the level of one's own IS, basing one's choices of lover interests upon the coupling of comparisons and conflicts that serve to contradict each other; as one's partner meets up to and then surpasses one's IS, this tendency to exceed proves disastrous to one's self-image due to the inability to live up to the newly raised bar of upward comparison. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCCogSelf.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
and repulsion is, according to Herbst et al (2003), what makes a person initially attracted to someone with his or her own similar traits but then ultimately come to reject
those same similarities when the love interest surpasses their IS. My Head Says Yes But My Heart Says No: Cognitive And Affective Attraction As A Function Of Similarity To
The Ideal Self delves into the cognitive and affective elements of attraction as they relate to the level of ones own IS, basing ones choices of lover interests upon the
coupling of comparisons and conflicts that serve to contradict each other; as ones partner meets up to and then surpasses ones IS, this tendency to exceed proves disastrous to ones
self-image due to the inability to live up to the newly raised bar of upward comparison. "Glances in a mirror at various times of the day find most of
us bouncing back and forth between pleased and appalled at what we see...as we spend time with someone and this person for some horrifying reason becomes more and more like
us, we are at first increasingly attracted, and then, as he or she surpass(es) the participants IS, the attraction plummets to the point of repulsion" ().
Many social psychologists would readily agree that human interaction is always representational of joint interaction, inasmuch as social interaction implies interacting with other persons; thus, the
meaning of that interaction is always to be a joint or collective accomplishment. Impression management represents a significant component of joint interaction; personal description is not just an individuals
presentation of his or her own self-image, but rather the means by which another accepts that image as reality. Therefore, if human interaction is considered to always represent joint
...