Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Hayden White's "The Content Of The Form; Narrative Discourse And Historical Representation" And Thomas Kuhn's "Structure Of Scientific Revolution" - Approach Comparison. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. The writer compares approaches between the two authors by illustrating that when discussing the significance of this comparison, what it teaches, why anyone should care about it and what it tells about history, it is important to expound upon 1) the important role history plays in mankind's overall understanding of himself and how that understanding is sometimes based upon more of personal perception than accounts of reality and 2) how science has served to virtually reconstruct man's existence in every way. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCKuhnWht.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
to be a relativist, indicates that introducing such ground-breaking concepts as were developed during the scientific revolution truly transformed the way in which the world operated. So many inventions
changed how people lived their lives that it was not difficult to leave behind the archaic in favor of the new and improved. The fundamental composition of Kuhns (1996) approach
in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is to illustrate how the future holds the answers to questions; however, those answers cannot be found without the constant growth of scientific research,
which is critical to the perpetuation of the planet as well as to the continuation of the human race. Kuhn (1996) notes how the basis of conventional scientific understanding
is utilizing the tools cast upon earths inhabitants in order to reap the benefits of discovery. To fully appreciate the contributions of the scientific revolution, he posited, one need
only realize that by effectively recognizing the discoveries of the past, the future becomes that much more attainable. Kuhn (1996) is undoubtedly the
most influential figure in the philosophy of science in the second half of the twentieth century. Examining his approach as to how scientific theories emerge, develop and demise over
time, the student will want to discuss two critical points to Kuhns philosophy: 1) different people are likely to apply standards of reason in different ways, and 2) doing so
reflects an important factor with regard to the extended development of scientific understanding (DAgostino, 2003). To this end, Kuhns (1996) philosophies completely contrast with myriad other theorists in relation
to whether changes take place as one tremendous alteration or, instead, in the form of small but numerous shifts. Kuhns (1996) primary observation is that sciences - in and of
...