Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Has Welfare Reform Worked?. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 11 page paper looks at the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act that was initiated under President Clinton's direction. Welfare reform is evaluated in light of economic conditions. Bibliography lists 10 sources.
Page Count:
11 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA242wel.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
just five years (Rodrigue, 1996). That is the short version of the legislation known as Welfare Reform. President Clinton elaborated at the time, stressing that it is a historic day
and that the country would now be able to utilize the welfare system as a second chance, and not a way of life (1996). The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act of 1996 was created to limit welfare benefits. While many suggest that it has had an impact on the welfare system, it has also had some successes and
some failures. While certain information does come to the forefront, there are problems when measuring the success of this Act. First, the concept of welfare reform has
been a lengthy battle. There are those on either side of the issue suggesting either that Welfare recipients are lazy or that they are victims of society and need help.
The debate is heated because tax dollars are in the discussion. Welfare is not free. The gist of the argument is that a cycle of poverty has enveloped many
communities where generation after generation has continued to accept government assistance as a way of life whereas the working population is up in arms over the fact that their hard
earned tax dollars are being funneled into this never ending altruistic machine. Economic concerns are valid. While sometimes the amount of money used for these programs is not terribly large,
and the recipients use the dollars as prescribed, there is widespread abuse and critics maintain that the funds could be better spent. There is also an issue of fairness. Why
should someone go out and get a job, survive on minimum wage, while their neighbor sits at home all day and gets a monthly stipend, albeit small, for doing virtually
...