Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on HARRIS COULTER'S 'DIVIDED LEGACY : THE CONFLICT BETWEENHOMEOPATHY AND THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION : SCIENCEAND ETHICS IN AMERICAN MEDICINE 1800-1910, VOL. III'. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. The writer offers a general book analysis of Coulter's third in a series of four books. No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLChomeo.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
wellness, there are two very different approaches to the same goal: homeopathic and allopathic. The two vastly diverse programs offered around the world provide similar benefits; however, it is
the road taken to achieve these benefits that greatly differ. Allopathic medicine is geared more toward the traditional, pharmaceutical therapy that has sustained throughout the centuries. Homeopathic medicine,
on the other hand, utilizes a whole body, noninvasive approach to aid in the bodys recuperation. Granted, both entities have their specific place within the innerworkings of overall wellness,
yet their diversity maintains them as separate practices. This is precisely the focus of Harris Coulters Divided Legacy : The Conflict Between Homeopathy and the American Medical
Association : Science and Ethics in American Medicine 1800-1910, Vol. III, the third in a series of four books that dares to delve deeply into the ongoing controversy
that exists between the two very different wellness applications. Coulter very unabashedly expresses both his fears and triumph with regard to the progression of modern medicine, readily addressing the fact
that twentieth century medicine is a concept that has him quite concerned over the myriad medicines and procedures that contemporary practitioners must know (Coulter, 1988, p. PG). Indeed, modern
allopathic medicine has been on an increasingly upward spiral over the last number of years, bringing with it many more complications that do not exist with homeopathic medicine. This
proves to be a primary issue with Coulter, inasmuch as he vehemently defends the publics option and reasoning for implementing alternative treatment as wholeheartedly as allopathic. Coulter discusses the inherent
evils of allopathic medicine, as he perceives them to be, carefully yet quite boldly stating his personal opinions on a wide range of medical concerns. Unquestionably, the fundamental
...