Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Group Dynamics Of A Volunteer Organization. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
6 pages in length. The writer discusses group dynamics in relation to formal and informal settings, addressing such issues as communication, stature and prestige. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCgroup.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
respect to members does not mean that a concise concept of hierarchy is not in order for business to thrive. There is no concrete method to establishing this structure
of authority, but rather it is developed as various personalities engage in the pertinent issues. Stature within a formal setting is achieved by setting specific parameters with regard to
the most experienced member; there are decidedly more corporate-like methods employed in this particular situation as a means by which to assert the formal aspect. The basis of an
informal group stature is more closely related to the efforts of the group as a whole, as opposed to the contributions of a single individual. "When people are getting
along well, theyre more focused, more innovative and more eager to contribute in a collaborative style. This cooperation enables the business to operate in a systemized, efficient way that
generates the power for the constant growth necessary to succeed" (Adams Hart, 1991, p. 48). II. DIFFERENCES IN RECIPROCAL ESTEEM In assessing the level of reciprocal esteem present within
a volunteer group, it can be argued that there may be some discrepancy when it comes to gender consideration. Social interpretation of gender dynamics as they relate to the
group atmosphere have always harbored clear-cut concepts of appropriate role playing, which has also led to the applicable levels of esteem granted to each side. In spite of the
fact that women have proven their capabilities as effective leaders, that role still remains most prevalently with men, creating an implied level of esteem. There is truly no scientific
proof that establishes the fact that "men are better as leaders than women" (Krug, 1998, p. 14) or that women are more allied when it comes to group dynamics, yet
...