Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Greenhouse Effect -- 2050. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 5 page research paper that takes the approach of what the world might be like in the year 2050 in regards to the environment and greenhouse gas emission. To answer this the writer discusses the Kyoto accord, why the US rejected them and what might be possible public policy in the future. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_khhotgas.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
early April 2002, the Larsen B ice shelf, a piece of ice about the same size as the state of Rhode Island (roughly half the size of Prince Edward Island
in Canada) broke off and disintegrated into icebergs because Antarctica is heating up five times faster than the rest of the globe (Anonymous, 2002). Lets suppose it is possible
to go to bed tonight and wake up in the year 2050. In regards to the environment and the global climate what might you find? This is a difficult question
to answer because the 2002 US government, and the American people as well, are still resisting acknowledging that there is even a problem, much less that something has to be
done to remedy it. In 2050, it is quite possible that global warming and the proliferation of greenhouse gasses, if unchecked, could result in all of the worlds coastal cities
being submerged from the rise in the oceans due to the melting of the polar ice caps. On the other hand, it may not be too late in 2002 to
stem the tide of global warming. If the US does a turnaround on environmental policy, 2050 may find the world with cleaner air and cleaner water. However, at the present
moment, the indications are far more likely for a bleak future. Ironically, it was roughly one year before the Antarctic ice shelf dramatically broke off, in 2001, that President George
Bush announced that the US was unequivocally withdrawing from the Kyoto Protocol. The Bush administration based this decision on the grounds that reducing US greenhouse gas emissions would "harm the
American way of life" (Bole, 2001). On the other hand, Cook (2002) argues that President Bush was correct to reject the Kyoto accord, stating that this "fantasy plan for sharply
...