Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on God’s Existence: Craig, Socrates, and Nietzsche. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 5 page paper which examines an argument concerning God’s existence, presented by William Lane Craig, and then discusses what Socrates and Nietzsche would argue. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: JR7_RAgdnze.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
no way to prove that god exists and in the field of philosophy it all comes down to a matter of belief for all philosophy essentially only argues that something
is true or not. Philosophy involves abstract thought and does not truly offer up solid points that can be proven. With that in mind the following paper examines William Lane
Craigs argument concerning morality and the existence of God. The paper examines what Socrates, in Platos Euthyphro, and Nietzsche, in Beyond Good and Evil, would have argued in relationship to
Craigs work. The paper also offers a personal response to Craigs argument. Gods Existence: Craig, Socrates, and Nietzsche Craig notes, most importantly, "God provides the best explanation for
objective moral values in the world. If God does not exist, then objective moral values do not exist" (Craig). He states that even atheists agree with this but then they
will likely also say that morals are merely a product of something else, and thus not really morals at all. He quotes the atheist Mackie who states, "It is easy
to explain this moral sense as a natural product of biological and social evolution" (Craig). In essence Craig is claiming that because these morals exist then God exists for
if they were not a part of society then it would be obvious that God did not exist. In relationship to what other philosophers from the past may have argued,
in reaction, Socrates is first noted in Platos work Euthyphro. He was a man who never truly held firm to any true "truth" as far as he could see. He
never really claimed to have the truth, to know the answers, but rather simply argued around points and of points in an attempt to further refine the possible truth. In
...