Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Global Governance and Anne-Marie Slaughter’s “A New World Order”. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 6 page paper which examines the concept of global governance within the context of Professor Slaughter’s text, and specifically considers whether it is moving in useful directions and to what extent should there be optimism or pessimism. No additional sources are used.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: TG15_TGnewworld.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
the Dean of Princeton Universitys Woodrow Wilson School of Public Affairs. In her text, A New World Order, Professor Slaughter refutes the notions of some that global governance is
little more than a work in progress that has unfortunately progressed very little. She confirms that the state of global governance is growing stronger every day and that there
is every reason to believe it is moving in directions that are useful for the United States and all nations of the world, great and small. Her arguments are
persuasive, even if some critics may complain they are ultimately overly optimistic. First of all, there is a difference between global government and global governance. Professor Slaughter declares,
"World government is both infeasible and undesirable. The size and scope of such a government presents an unavoidable and dangerous threat to individual liberty. Further, the diversity of
the peoples to be governed makes it almost impossible to conceive of a global demos. No form of democracy within the current global repertoire seems capable of overcoming these
obstacles" (8). Global governance, on the other hand, is a preferable alternative because it exists as "a much looser and less threatening concept of collective organization and regulation without
coercion" (Slaughter 8). As the result, there has been an increase in global policy networks that synthesize all issues of public interest, such as world markets, international travel, and
the threat posed by weapons of mass destruction (Slaughter 4). Professor Slaughter acknowledges that advocating networks on a global government scale might seem like a surprising proposal considering it
was an intricate network organized by Osama bin Laden that has been responsible for terrorist attacks in the United States and several areas throughout the world. But networks can
...