Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on George C. Herring's America's Longest War. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
US involvement in the Vietnam Conflict occurred for a number of reasons that were more complex than simply the desire of the United States to prevent the spread of communism. In his work America's Longest War, Herring reflects on a number of common war theories to explain US involvement and to define the essence of the action taken. Herring also demonstrates the underpinnings of the war itself and the nature of the perspectives, both national and international, that sustained the conflict and US involvement for so long. This 5 page paper considers the elements of Herring's discourse, while also providing a view of the war itself and defining the underpinnings that supported its longevity. No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_Gherring.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
of common war theories to explain US involvement and to define the essence of the action taken. Herring also demonstrates the underpinnings of the war itself and the nature
of the perspectives, both national and international, that sustained the conflict and US involvement for so long. There are a number of different war theories that can be
applied to determining US involvement and the process of war as a whole. Commonly the bureaucratic and organizational process model has been applied as a means of understanding the
forces that impact world politics and determine involvement in similar actions. In correlation with this fundamental theory, the rational actor model, which asserts that the basis of war extends
from the necessity determined within the scope of an organizational framework, is essential to defining the premise of war in the midst of international politicking. Other theories that can
be applied to understanding the US involvement in the war include the realist theory of war and balance of power, each of which underscore the natural progression of political, social
and economic issues and their prevalence in determining the route of American interactions. One of the problem in applying many different models or theories to the
nature of international politics is that they are often relatively impracticable because of the size, scope and number of players involved in international politics, and the nature of involvement based
not only in political interests, but also in economic and social interests as well. This is the underlying perspective that comes into view when considering the elements of the
Vietnam Conflict and the viewpoints presented by Herring. The interconnected elements of both rational actor theory and the bureaucratic and organizational model are beneficial in understanding the correlation between
...