Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Genetically Modified Food: Two Views
. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper compares two opposing viewpoints about the use of genetically modified foods. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_HVGMFTwo.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
modification is Gerald D. Coleman, SS; the "SS" indicates that he is a member of the Roman Catholic religious order known as the "Society of the Priests of St. Sulpice,"
men whose mission it is to train others to serve in the priesthood (Sulpicians: Who we are). Coleman is apparently on sabbatical from his position as the Rector of St.
Patricks Seminary in Menlo Park, California; the mission of Seminary is to "instruct priests and future priests in the interior life and help them develop an apostolic spirit" through the
use of "spiritual direction, academic preparation and pastoral supervision" (Sulpicians: What we do). The ordained priests at St. Patricks live in the same complex as the students, providing living examples
of what ideal priests should be (Sulpicians: What we do). In short, Coleman is a teacher. He has also published numerous articles on scientific matters. (This should not be a
surprise, as some of the most intelligent and rigorous work in science is done by the Catholic Church, specifically the Jesuits.) Colemans major thesis is that genetic food modification is
not necessarily harmful, but could be a scientifically viable way of combating world hunger. He is careful to state the opposing positions as well, and shows an understanding of the
objections made by others. His final conclusion, however, is that the use of genetically modified food, when controlled, is one solution to the problem of world hunger (Coleman, 2005). The
difficulty, in his view, lies in the fact that the genetically modified seeds will not be available to everyone equally, thus putting poorer nations at a disadvantage when compared to
richer ones (Coleman, 2005). He suggests that control of the material must be fair in order to avoid this inequality (Coleman, 2005). Two facts that Coleman uses to support his
...