Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Gavin: Strong And Weak Points. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. Legendary World War II paratrooper Lt. Gen. James Maurice Gavin epitomized what it means to be a stellar military leader; with the combination of great charm, extraordinary intelligence and moral/physical courage, Gavin was the reflection of what it truly means to be a leader of the people. Indeed, one of the most difficult decisions of his entire career revolved around the requisite massive retaliation; believing this counterstrike invalidated, Gavin quit his position as a means by which to uphold his own credibility, along with the ideal of moral fortitude he imparted upon those who respected him. Bibliography lists 7 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCGavin.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
the reflection of what it truly means to be a leader of the people. Indeed, one of the most difficult decisions of his entire career revolved around the requisite
massive retaliation; believing this counterstrike invalidated, Gavin quit his position as a means by which to uphold his own credibility, along with the ideal of moral fortitude he imparted upon
those who respected him. "A study of Gavin in combat provides the student of military history timeless lessons in battlefield leadership. Gavin led with his M?1 Garand rifle
in hand, never far from the action. He was critical of other leaders for losing touch with the combat environment and not knowing the conditions the line soldier was
facing" (Paratrooper). Examining the extent to which Patton would have considered Gavin a stellar example of military leadership leaves one to consider Gavins decision to quit instead of take
action on a maneuver which he did not support. Patton was as cantankerous as any egoist, power hungry military leader was; however, he understood the importance of following orders.
Whether or not Pattons ideals applied to Gavin is a notion upon which each individual might render a different answer: Would Patton have reacted the same given Gavins situation,
or would he have stood by his command and followed through in spite of any personal conflict? Given the moniker of Old Blood and Guts, one can readily surmise
that Patton would not have supported Gavins withdrawal, considering it to be both cowardice and completely against the war effort. Indeed, there is no question as to Fullers impression
of Gavins decision - a highly supportive nod that is indicative of what Fuller asserts is so critical - yet so absent - from myriad contemporary military leaders. Additionally,
...