Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Fordism V Post-Fordism : Which Promotes Equity. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page paper that discusses both models and determines which promotes greater equity. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: MM12_PGfords.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
line (Jessop, n.d.). Workers are semi-skilled (Jessop, n.d.). Fordism also incorporates other characteristics, such as the state becoming involved in managing conflict and the separation between the governing structure and
the owners (Jessop, n.d.). In general, post-Fordism is described and defined as "a flexible production process based on flexible systems and an appropriately flexible workforce" (Jessop, n.d.). It comes about
because of advanced electronic information technology (Jessop, n.d.). It is based on flexibility of production, employees incomes that increase and increased profits (Jessop, n.d.). Post-Fordism considers the needs of the
world and the needs of the consumer more than Fordism (Jessop, n.d.). Although the word Fordism is named after Henry Ford who designed the mass production assembly line process
(Jessop, n.d.), it was Antonio Gramsci who coined the term (Goldman, n.d.). Analysts consistently use the term to identify mechanized production with its simultaneous mass consumption of products that have
been standardized through the process (Goldman, n.d .). This type of production, modeled on Taylors scientific management theory, "brought with it the deskilling of work" (Goldman, n.d.). As production increased, demand
grew, which, in turn, led to the need for higher salaries for workers (Goldman, n.d.). Ford offered $5.00 a day for workers who could cope with the production line and
the need for constantly increasing speed (Goldman, n.d.). That salary would allow the worker to buy one of the cars he was building (Goldman, n.d.). Fordism also brought bureaucracy to
the corporation (Goldman, n.d.). Eventually, workers became dissatisfied and disheartened with the mechanization and the standardization of their work (Goldman, n.d.). In fact, it was this very dissatisfaction that would
lead to the initial success of labor unions (Goldman, n.d.). When anyone used the terms Fordism or Fordist, everyone knew this meant a highly structured, rigid work environment with
...