Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on FEMA's Response: Why Did It Take So Long?. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. Strongly criticized throughout its recent history, FEMA's response time – according to those who challenge the Agency's performance record – has left much to be desired where Hurricane Katrina is concerned. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCFemaKat.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
be desired where Hurricane Katrina is concerned. At the crux of the problem is FEMAs obligation where financial considerations reside, inasmuch as the Agency "must work with local and
state governments, who contribute 25% of the costs, which causes delays while the governments seek funding" (Taylor, 1992, p. 2703). The general public, disaster victims and many others who
have operated directly at ground zero with disaster relief do not readily understand nor accept this reasoning, arguing how large disasters such as Hurricane Katrina are better handled by the
military whose workforce and equipment far surpass FEMAs limited scope of authorizing grants and loans. The National Response Plan - the strategy set in place to manage response time during
the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina - was nowhere near ready or able to rise to such a precedence-setting occasion as this, inasmuch as it is "still in its infant stages
(Marek et al, 2005, p. 36). In its convoluted attempt to disseminate aid in a timely fashion, FEMA sent itself on a downward spiral with its first mistake, which
was putting the plan in motion only after the levees broke. Moreover, Brown took an inexplicably long period of time to dispatch 1,000 DHS workers, a painfully brief window
of opportunity that would have afforded a much more comprehensive rescue response had he not waited forty-eight hours before giving the order. Said Rep. Peter King (R), "what were
realizing now...is that [federal officials] were just so careful and so worried that money would be misspent that they basically held back" (Marek et al, 2005, p. 36). From another
perspective - and one that has often eclipsed the political hand-tying between state and federal response obligations - is how FEMA head Michael Brown was wholly unprepared - both professionally
...