Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on European Impact Of China's Neglect Of IPR. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
9 pages in length. The antagonistic issue of ownership is one that transcends virtually all boundaries of what might otherwise be considered a civilized society. From ancient Rome to contemporary times, the fight for lawful claim upon a certain entity has been ensnared within the confines of man's contempt for fair distribution of any given commodity. Implementing Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is the easy part; enforcing them is another matter entirely and one that has eluded Chinese officials for the four decades they have been attempting to thwart this tremendous infringement upon global commerce and high-end products. Bibliography lists 12 sources.
Page Count:
9 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCChinaIPR.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
to contemporary times, the fight for lawful claim upon a certain entity has been ensnared within the confines of mans contempt for fair distribution of any given commodity. Implementing
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is the easy part; enforcing them is another matter entirely and one that has eluded Chinese officials for the four decades they have been attempting to
thwart this tremendous infringement upon global commerce and high-end products. Patents, trademarks, designs and copyright reflect the four primary aspects of IP concern,
however, such other elements as trade secrets, plant varieties, geographical indications and performers rights - just to mention a few - also reflect illegal infringement with regard to IPR.
Even with all these facets to consider, piracy of high-end products from such companies as Prada, Gucci and LVMH represents the most problematic for China: In this day and age
when the process of duplication is both easy and inexpensive, the motivation to purchase authentic items is not as strong as the inclination to buy its reproduced counterpart at a
fraction of the cost. Unquestionably, the issue of bootlegged high-end products has outgrown the stage where it was little more than an inconvenience to manufacturers whose economic loss was
considered otherwise negligible. The beginning of the twenty-first century finds IPR infringement a tremendous money-making endeavor, leaving rightful manufacturers with little left to do but pound their collective fists
in despair or take on the Chinese bootleg industry by fighting back. Clear illustration of a global system working to protect those who rightly own manufacturing and distribution rights to
high-end products comes in the form a the recent precedent-setting copyright victory of five European companies over a Chinese shopping mall landlord. Prada, Chanel, LVMH, Gucci and Louis Vuitton
...