Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Ethical Dilemma Concerning Do Not Resuscitate Orders. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
7 pages in length. A terminally ill patient scheduled to have palliative surgery is refused by her doctor unless she reverses the Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order she put in place to address her incurable disease. The reason why her physician required his patient to change her DNR to full code while in the operating room is unclear; perhaps he did not want to have the responsibility of her potential death looming over his head without a way in which to medically address the situation. Maybe he was not fully aware of the extent to which her terminal illness necessitated such a drastic order as the DNR. Regardless of his inability or downright refusal to accept the patient's wishes, he was committing a rather serious breach of ethics where his medical practitioner's behavior is concerned. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLC_DNR.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
The reason why her physician required his patient to change her DNR to full code while in the operating room is unclear; perhaps he did not want to have
the responsibility of her potential death looming over his head without a way in which to medically address the situation. Maybe he was not fully aware of the extent
to which her terminal illness necessitated such a drastic order as the DNR. Regardless of his inability or downright refusal to accept the patients wishes, he was committing a
rather serious breach of ethics where his medical practitioners behavior is concerned. Indeed, the patient is more than within her rights as a
human being to determine when and to what extent she is to receive any heroic measures to restore life; that her illness is terminal and the scheduled surgery is meant
to relieve pain associated with that disease should be enough to convince her doctor just how important it is to maintain the DNR throughout the palliative procedure. The patients autonomy
- or moral independence - is all-important when it comes to decisions of a life or death nature. It is not up to the physician to impart his personal
morality upon a woman who is grappling with the final phase of her life and does not want to be brought back to life when there is not medically valid
reason for such heroic measures. While the doctor may believe this alleged beneficence will help his patient, he is in fact not doing the good he believes he is;
instead, he is displaying unrecognized maleficence by giving the woman such an inhumane ultimatum. He most certainly harbors a skewed fidelity to his patient by not honoring her DNR.
...