Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Energy Policy Dilemma. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 6 page paper discussing US energy policy. Can fossil fuel electricity generation be sustained for generations? No. Then we need alternatives. Will there be oil available to fuel the world's cars in four generations? No. Then we need alternatives. We need to be cognizant of businesses' bottom lines. They cannot operate in perpetual loss; we need to take a larger view of the true costs of both action and inaction. The concept of the "triple bottom line" – cost effectiveness now, cost effectiveness later and whether an action is sustainable for the future – is valuable in determining which course of action needs to be made now. All we have to do is convince our politicians – of both parties – to use its logic. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: CC6_KSenergyPol.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
policy can be described with this statement: "we want to find and develop more domestic supplies of oil, natural gas and coal and, in addition, to accelerate the implementation of
more nuclear capacity." The Bush administration is behaving in ways that support that statement. Democrats maintain an official party platform plank labeled "environmentalism," but that is only for
show and votes and is without substance. Al "Mr. Environmentalism" Gore perennially is one of the worst corporate polluters in the state of Tennessee, arguing against fines for polluting
his home state even while authoring books hailed as visionary among those who speak in terms of "saving the Earth." The bottom line
is that both primary political parties continue to dance around the issues that need to be examined. All of those now posturing to present images that do not exist
eventually either will have to get real about the issues or move over for others who will. It is likely that one of the minor oil producers of the
Mideast, Syria, will become an oil importer before the end of the decade. "Sooner or later" is now. Opposing Views
The view that the Republicans tend to favor is that the U.S. needs its own supply of energy to meet the demand of its
citizens and decrease the dependence on foreign oil (Emerson, Piore, Ness and Edry, 2002). Superficially, this is a logical conclusion to the question of how to reduce dependence on
foreign oil. Oil is available from more than only mideast countries, but they are the worlds leading suppliers and the ones on which we most depend.
...