Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Eight Elements Of Critical Thinking. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. The writer briefly discusses diversity, ethnocentrism, skepticism, fallibility of inquiry, contextuality of knowledge, objectivity, transformative and fragility of ideals as they relate to critical thinking. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCcritthnk8.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
consider more than just their own opinions. At its core, diversity means to think from another perspective and contemplate what a resolution may be from that angle; applying a
few different viewpoints provides a much greater understanding of the issue as a whole, which in turn leads to "the most reliable, logical, and trustworthy conclusions" (Schafersman, 2008). II.
ETHNOCENTRISM Perceived superiority of race often clouds the capacity for truly critical thinking. This ethnic division often leads to partitioning of each group and the inability to consider any
aspect of the issue beyond an individuals own cultural implications. For example, the ethnocentric barrier found within the workplace is not only obvious in daily operations but it also
carries over into the more personal aspects of workplace dynamics. Offices have groups of Spanish, French- or English-speaking employees who segregate themselves according to their spoken language, a behavior
that serves to establish separation between and among the varied ethnic workers within an atmosphere that requires a much greater level of interaction. III. SKEPTICISM Cautious belief is
the mantra associated with having a healthy skepticism. No matter how reliable the source, it is always a good idea to ferret out additional information about a particular issue
in order to draw informed conclusions rather than rely upon the conclusions of others. Any number of components can influence data presented as truth, not the least of which
includes personal agenda or erroneous facts. To be skeptical is to question the validity of a given claim, forcing the informant of said claim to provide more convincing evidence
or choosing to eschew that source altogether. IV. FALLIBILITY OF INQUIRY To understand how no conclusion is exempt from potential criticism or
...