Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Early Childhood Settings. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 6 page research paper that recounts observations concerning developmentally appropriate practice in an early childhood setting and also practice that is inappropriate. This writer, first of all, focuses on the difference between developmentally appropriate and inappropriate practice. Secondly, the topic of successful accommodation and adaptation, for children with special needs, is also be discussed. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_khdevpch.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
proliferation of early childhood programs that promise parents that some form of direct instruction will turn their toddler into a "super kid" (Zeng and Zeng, 2005). Such didactic approaches to
the instruction of your children have been shown by research to be inconsistent with the developmentally appropriate practice. The National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) has issued
a position paper providing guidelines for developmentally appropriate practices in order to protect young children from the negative effects of inappropriate expectations in early childhood settings (Zeng and Zeng, 2005).
Developmentally appropriate practice rests on a solid body of research that demonstrates the efficacy of developmentally appropriate practice (Wambach, Brothen and Dikel, 2000). The following examination of early childhood
settings, first of all, focuses on the difference between developmentally appropriate and inappropriate practice. Secondly, the topic of successful accommodation and adaptation for children with special needs will also be
discussed. Developmentally inappropriate practice There have been numerous early childhood programs that attract parents by asserting that such programs will aid their children in by helping them get
ahead in their academic preparation (Zeng and Zeng, 2005). According to research performed by Olenick in the 1980s, out of 100 randomly selected child care programs in the Los Angeles,
California area roughly 25 percent of programs surveyed employed strict didactic instruction (Zeng and Zeng, 2005). These programs fall into the category that Olenick later referred to as the "Sit
down, shut up and count to 100" variety (Zeng and Zeng, 2005, p. 706). Olenick observed children as young as 2 years old being forced to spend their mornings seated
at tables or desks "reciting the alphabet, counting to 100, and drawing letters with pencils" (Zeng and Zeng, 2005, p. 706). A study performed by Bryant, Clifford, and Peisner
...