Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Dr. Zak’s Depression Test. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page paper that responds to two questions about Dr. Zak’s depression test. The first question discusses sampling and the sampling method that was used. The second question discusses the administration of the test. Bibliography lists 1 source.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: ME12_PGzakdp.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
citation methods listed below. Citation styles constantly change, and these examples may not contain the most recent updates.?? Dr. Zaks Depression Test Research compiled for The Paper
Store, , August 2010 properly! 1. Type of sampling method used The sampling method was
basically stratified sampling insofar as Dr. Zak left the questionnaires at each residence and residents did or did not complete the form through their own volition. Dr. Zak was investigating
depression among college students. It would make sense to either leave surveys in classes or in the dorms. There was just one population, college students (Cohen and Swerdlik, 2009, p.
112). This population is also convenient for Dr. Zak. With any research, the researcher is constrained by time and money. Dr. Zak used the population to whom she had access
but students completed the questionnaire voluntarily. The sample is not good enough. Norms can not be determined because of a number of variables. The most significant factor is the great
disparity between the numbers of men and women, 70 percent women and 30 percent men. When one population is so much larger, a researcher can not determine norms. The
test only has five questions. An answer of yes to the first four indicates depression, an answer of no on the last question means depression. Dr. Zak calculated a mean
score of 1.5, which is at the low end of the scale and would be considered the norm. A standard deviation of 0.5 would suggest that the normal range for
test takers would be 1.0 to 2.0. This range would suggest the test taker is not depressed. These would be considered local norms (Cohen and Swerdlik, 2009, p. 121). They
...