Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Dogma Vs. Free Thought As A Way Of Life Pertaining To The Middle Ages. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
4 pages in length. The extent to which dogma better reflects a way of life than free thought when pertaining to the Middle Ages is both grand and far-reaching; that the definite authoritative tenet of feudalism represented the very political and economic nature of the period speaks to the wholly dogmatic approach toward lower class labor. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCDogmaMA.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
that the definite authoritative tenet of feudalism represented the very political and economic nature of the period speaks to the wholly dogmatic approach toward lower class labor.
Politics in the Middle Ages held a decidedly feudalistic appeal, inasmuch as the lord/vassal union represented the periods definite authoritative tenet - or dogma. Feudalism
originated as a means by which a small population could maintain tight control over Europes political and economic system. Having been compared with the Celts chiefdom political system, feudalism
afforded powerful families the ability to hold the political reins over entire societies, just as long as these particular families upheld their political loyalties and alliances. This clich? type
of political and economic rule was considered to be quite popular between and among the applicable families; however, it was not as welcomed by the rest of the citizenry.
Inherent to the concept of feudalism was the desire to place all political and economic control in the hands of but a few of
the upper class citizens, while forcing all those who were classified as peasants to abide by the whims of this self-appointed monarchy. One of the quests that sprung from
employing the notion of feudalism was to create the vassal/lord union as a means by which to establish "a mutually protective relationship" (Anonymous, 2001); however, by the time of AD
1000, it had been brought into existence that with military service, the vassal was to receive land in exchange. This proved to be quite advantageous to the individual who
inevitably earned the property, yet it was any but to the rightful owner or inhabitant, whose "rights of governance and of jurisdiction" (Anonymous, 2001) were completely suppressed.
...