Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Does Your Coworker Know What You're Doing?. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper provides an overview of the validity and reliability in the article entitled Does Your Coworker Know What You're Doing?. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: MH11_MHCoworker.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
counterproductive work behavior (CWB). The researchers argue that past studies of CWB look primarily at self-report measures and that these measures that lack validity. In creating a higher
level of validity and reliability in studies of counterproductive work behavior, the authors propose the use of studies of both self-reports and peer-reports to determine whether correspondence exists.
The concepts of validity and reliability correspond directly with the methods utilized in producing the data in a descriptive statistical study using
a quantitative, non-experimental approach. Validity refers to the studys relevance, correctness, and significance in its basic hypothesis, method, and interpretation. Simply put, a study is valid if it measures
what it claims to measure. In the case of the study by Fox and Spector (2007), the researchers identify the major
concepts and the level of comparison that they seek to prove through an outlining of multiple hypotheses. Initially, the researchers identify a number of counterproductive work behavior (CWB) types,
including counterproductive behavior that references anothers personal life and counter productive behavior that targets the organization. The authors then go back and challenge some existing studies of CWB, arguing
that these past studies lacked reliability because they integrated self-report measures that did not show a high degree of validity. In order
to address the problem of validity as it impacts the outcomes of this and similar studies, the researchers seek to put into place strategies, including the use of triangulation, to
determine whether links can be made to outcomes of self-report measures that are significant different from the outcomes of peer or coworker-reports of the behaviors of the individual (Fox and
...