Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Do We Need A World Government. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 6 page paper that provides a discussion on the premise of having a single world government and presents the arguments of those who support this idea and those who oppose it. The writer discusses the UN as a world governing body. Some of the major benefits of a world government are reported with supporting statements. The possible structure of such a government is also reported. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: MM12_PGwldgv.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
What is needed to bring democracy and justice to all people in the world? Many believe the only way to end violent uprisings, conflicts and wars is to have a
single world government. Bertrand Russell promoted this idea many years ago: "The is only one way to prevent war, and that is by setting up a single world government which
could solely control all the great and important weapons" (Kamal, n.d.). Russell went on to say that some regions would accept a world government but others would not and it
would be necessary to forcibly bring the opposing regions into such a structure (Kamal, n.d.). Russell explained this conclusion: "I do not suppose that the human race possesses such
an ability and statesmanship to submit to the establishment of a world government willingly and wholeheartedly. That is why I think that the use of force and pressure is necessary
at the outset for its establishment and preservation" (Kamal, n.d.). Other well-known figures have promoted world government and world citizenship, including Jacques Maritain, the French philosopher, Rabindranath Tagore, the
Indian Nobel Laueate and Mortimer Adler (West Point, n.d.). Maritain said "the death of the dysfunctional nation-state and the and the inauguration of World Government" was the only way "peace
and justice will be guaranteed" (West Point, n.d.). A world government would bring about universal morality and ethical codes to which all citizens would be encourages to subscribe (West Point,
n.d.). In centuries past, wars were about territory and expanding one nation by conquering another. Power was inherently a motivation. In modern history, there have been far more wars between
cultures and religions than between nations. And, the motives have been ideological rather than adding more territory to a nation. Samuel Huntington, Harvard historian, said that "todays and tomorrows frictions
...