Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Distinguishing Humans from Animals and Machines
. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
                                            
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper uses readings by Henig (“The Real Transformers”) and Hanlon (“Can an Animal Fall in Love?”) to discuss the ways in which we distinguish animals from machines. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
                                                
Page Count: 
                                                3 pages (~225 words per page)
                                            
 
                                            
                                                File: D0_HVanimac.rtf
                                            
                                            Buy This Term Paper »
                                          
                                             
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
                                                    
                                                
                                                    Transformers") and Michael Hanlon ("Can an animal fall in love?" as a springboard for discussion. Discussion 	The Henig article is a long piece that explores the creation of robots and  
                                                
                                                    how they interact with their creators and other visitors. Henig meets a number of robots, always in a laboratory setting, and is impressed by the fact that they seem to  
                                                
                                                    truly interact with humans (2007). Upon closer inspection, however, it becomes apparent that even when a robot really appears to be responding to, or interacting with, a human, in actual  
                                                
                                                    fact it is compiling a number of complex and sophisticated programs in order to seem as if it is really aware of itself and others (Henig, 2007).  	Henig writes  
                                                
                                                    that we are all machines of one kind or another, but that doesnt seem particularly convincing, especially when in another example she writes that some of the robots now being  
                                                
                                                    built "come equipped with the very abilities that humans have evolved to ease our interactions with one another: eye contact, gaze direction, turn-taking, shared attention" (Henig, 2007). But these are  
                                                
                                                    machines and they are programmed; "programmed to learn the way humans learn, by starting with a core of basic drives and abilities and adding to them as their physical and  
                                                
                                                    social experiences accrue" (Henig, 2007). As a result of the sophistication of the programs, people "respond to the robots social cues almost without thinking, and as a result the robots  
                                                
                                                    give the impression of being somehow, improbably, alive" (Henig, 2007). 	By they are not alive, and the question of their ability to think and feel in the same way humans  
                                                
                                                    do is uncertain. Were clearly many years away from the sophistication of an android like Mr. Data; were not even close to a robot with a fraction of that ability  
                                                
                                                    ...