Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Death Penalty in Michigan. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page research paper that argues in favor of the implementation of the death penalty in Michigan. The essay attempts to refute argument against the death penalty and focuses on the stance that it can be implemented justly. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_khdpmi.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
degree murder cases (Capital punishment, 1999). Supporters of instituting the death penalty in Michigan cite the record-breaking number of murders that have taken place in Detroit in recent years as
the most viable reason for utilization of the laws ultimate penalty, which is an argument that focuses on the death penalty as a deterrent to crime. Proponents of capital punishment
in the US generally rest their case on three arguments: deterrence, incapacitation and retribution (Bedau, 2004). Death penalty opponents offer persuasive and legitimate objections to the way that the death
penalty has been utilized in this country; however, ultimately, it has to be acknowledged that there are cases in which capital punishment is the only legitimate response to the heinous
nature of some deeds. Opponents to the death penalty point out that empirical research does not support the supposition that the death penalty has any effect as a deterrent
to crime and, therefore, the nations leading criminologists do not endorse its use in this regard (Bedau, 2004). As for the death penalty being justified in that it removes or
incapacitates criminals, protecting public safety, opponents say that the experience of states, such as Michigan, where the death penalty is not practiced, as well as numerous other European countries,
illustrates that incapacitation without the death penalty is possible through incarceration (Bedau, 2004). Even when these two rationales are negated, the justification of retribution remains strong with many Americans. Opponents
argue that the emotional closure that victims families believe they will experience is an illusion and that empirical evidence fails to support this pro-death penalty argument. As this brief summary
of the anti-death penalty position indicates, these arguments are counter-intuitive to how many Americans perceive these points. First of all, it does not make sense that the death penalty
...