Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on De Bono's Six Thinking Hats. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
4 pages in length. Understanding the true nature of conflict resolution is held deep within a concept of parallel thinking whereby everyone involved in the issue approaches the outcome through proactive and critical thinking that encourages a meeting of the minds even though - and perhaps in spite of - differing opinions. The Six Thinking Hats system developed by de Bono establishes half a dozen specific characteristics of this journey that set a calculated path toward reaching amicable resolution. Applying these six components to the case study will provide a greater opportunity to acquire a more humane outcome for the patient. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLC6thnkhats.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
a meeting of the minds even though - and perhaps in spite of - differing opinions. The Six Thinking Hats system developed by de Bono establishes half a dozen
specific characteristics of this journey that set a calculated path toward reaching amicable resolution. Applying these six components to the case study will provide a greater opportunity to acquire
a more humane outcome for the patient. Everyone focuses on the same type of thinking at the same time (parallel thinking), which minimizes conflict and promotes progress. When
switching hats, everyone changes to the different mode of thinking to tap into their collective knowledge. This eliminates egos and has the potential to dramatically reduce the amount of
time spent in meetings (de Bono Consulting, 2008). II. SIX HATS OF CRITICAL THINKING Utilizing the six hats - white, information; black, potential problems; red, gut instinct; green, alternatives;
yellow, benefits; and blue, action plans - the nurse begins by familiarizing herself with pertinent data to better support her position. Most importantly is how the nurse sees a
complete neurological exam has not been done; secondly, the husband and children are at odds with one another as to the level of care their loved one would want at
this point inasmuch as she has no directives. The most significant of potential problems in hat number two is twofold: 1) the patient may not live long enough for
surgery if the family does not come to a mutual agreement soon and 2) the patients post-surgical outcome may well be no better - and perhaps worse - than her
condition currently is. Because of the suddenness and intensity associated with hemorrhagic stroke, time is of the essence. The third hat finds the nurses gut instinct focused upon quality
...