Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Daryl Close And Nicholas Meier's "Morality In Criminal Justice : An Introduction To Ethics" : Discretion And Decision Making. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. The writer discusses the section of Discretion And Decision Making in the book "Morality In Criminal Justice : An Introduction To Ethics." No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCcrim.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
moral and ethical obligation is humanity under within the scope of existence? In their book entitled Morality In Criminal Justice: An Introduction To Ethics, Daryl Close and Nicholas Meier
are instrumental in acknowledging in their discussion of Discretion and Decision Making that universal law of good will can only exist if what is right for one person is also
extended to the next by implying that if it is viewed as being right for one individual to take a given action then it must be right for all others
to do the same, as well. In effect, the authors imply that by breaking ones moral commitment is to abandon ones sense of ethical relativism. To delve into
the concept of ethical relativism is to examine the wide and varying societal rules that bind one to ones cultural existence. Indeed, it is important to consider the fact
that both Close and Meier -- an academic expert in criminal justice and a former cop -- harbor strong sentiments with regard to moral behavior and how it affects society
as a whole. There exist a great many philosophies by which people live their lives. These philosophies help maintain order and a
sense of direction that otherwise would merely drift in subconscious thought, which in turn provide the concepts of how people incorporate ethical occurrences throughout their daily existence. Clearly, when
an individual stretches his or her ethical judgment within the criminal justice system and attempts to justify an unethical decision, it can readily be argued that there exists a deeper
underlying reason for such a socially unacceptable behavior to be excused. To this the authors appear to imply that this notion focuses significantly more upon the rationality of each
...