Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Daniel Goleman’s Theory. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page paper. In the mid-1990s, Goleman argued that leaders must have high emotional intelligence to succeed. Research confirmed the importance of emotional intelligence. This paper explains Goleman’s theory, components in EQ, and why it is important. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: ME12_PGeqg10.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
citation methods listed below. Citation styles constantly change, and these examples may not contain the most recent updates.?? DANIEL GOLEMANS THEORY
, September 2010 properly! Effective leadership has been discussed by hundreds of experts, authors, and
practitioners. One of the more recent theories on this topic is Golemans theory of emotional intelligence. Goleman was not the first author who proposed that personal interaction and social interaction
skills were necessary for leaders and managers to succeed. He did, however, address it in a different way. He called it emotional intelligence. In 1995, Daniel Goleman published book entitled
"Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ for Character, Health and Lifelong Achievement." It was in this book that Goleman introduced the concept of emotional intelligence and asserted
that emotional intelligence was as important as knowledge, skills and cognitive intelligence for effective leadership (Goleman, 2004). In fact, he said that emotional intelligence is the "sine qua non of
leadership" (Goleman, 2004, p. 82). In a study of more than 200 organizations, Goleman found that emotional intelligence was twice as important as cognitive intelligence and technical knowledge (Schachter, 2009;
Webb, 2009). Schachter (2009) said that emotional intelligence accounts for at least 60 percent of the leaders success. From this study, Goleman identified different components of emotional intelligence. Goleman, Boyatzis
and McKee (2002) would later collect data from more than 4,000 executives. From this study, they identified six primary styles of leadership, which they called, visionary, affiliative, pacesetting, democratic, coaching
and commanding (Wilson 2006; Goleman, Boyatzis & McKee 2002). The authors asserted that all six styles are needed but they are used at different times and for difference situations. These
...