Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on DEMOCRACY, THE GOD THAT FAILED: A REVIEW
. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 6 page paper discusses and reviews the book: Democracy the God that Failed, by Hans-Herman Hoppe. The first part of the essay gives a detailed overview of the book while the last half interjects and reviews the flawed logic inherent in the text. Bibliography lists 1 source.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_MBhoppe.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
never know the true account of what happened. As soon as the historian or political analyst has put pen to paper, so too has he/she placed his/her bias and personality
into the interpretation of the events, people, and systems in place at the time. Such is the case with Hans-Herman Hoppe and his book, Democracy: The God that Failed.
What becomes quite evident from the first few paragraphs into this book is that Hoppe presents himself as a very learned scholar and astute historian who is simply weighing historys
evidence as the United States moved from a monarchy toward the system of democracy which it enjoys today. According to Hoppe, in the final analysis a monarchy is actually
more beneficial and practical in the long run than a democracy. He does not slight one for the other and in fact manages to show how monarchies have their problems
as well. He presents this evidence based on social theorems that can be applied with a type of hind-sight toward events which happened in the past. Given this then, he
allows the reader to come to the same conclusions that he has, which is that democracy, a true democracy, would never work for mankind. For example, using this methodology,
he illustrates how based on the Ricardian Law of Transformation, one can explain why there have been rising levels of crime, loss of moral constraints and the growth of the
mega-state in the present day. In fact, after a close reading of the text it becomes apparent that he supports more of a natural order of things in which everyone
governs themselves by the best way they are able with overtones which smack of utilitarianism. In addition, he predicts that in the future most of the nations of the world
...