Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Criteria for Employee Drug Testing. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 2.5 page paper which examines two specific conditions in which a company should be allowed to test its employees for drugs. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
2 pages (~225 words per page)
File: TG15_TGdrugtest.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
drug free (Griffin et al, 2001). Ever since, other private employers within the corporate sector, both large and small, have followed suit. This practice has ignited heated debate
as to whether or not companies should be allowed to test their employees for drugs. There are many issues to be considered in this very delicate matter, including employee
privacy and prejudice (statistics indicate blue-collar workers are more often targeted for drug testing than those employees occupying white-collar positions). But the overwhelming facts in support of employee drug
testing clearly speak for themselves. According to data published in 2002, out of the 12.3 million adults who use illegal drugs, 6.5 percent of them are full-time employees while
8.6 percent are working part time (Miles, 2002, p. 9). Because the average full-time employee spends at least 40 hours a week in the workplace, it is the responsibility
of company management to ensure that this environment is a safe, healthy and productive one for everyone who works there. The major condition in which a company should be allowed
to test employees for drugs is when the safety, either for employees, consumers or others, is affected. The Omnibus Employee Testing Act of 1991 demanded mandatory drug and alcohol
testing "for employees in safety-sensitive positions," and was implemented by the Clinton Administration in 1994 (Griffin et al, 2001, p. 467). This legislation targeted such positions as railroads, airline,
mass transit, motor carrier and pipeline types of companies. But within the healthcare industry, the safety of personnel and patients alike should be of paramount importance. According to
a 1989 published report, substance abuse by healthcare employees was 30 to 100 times more likely than drug abuse by the general population (Montoya et al, 1999). Because hospital
...