Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Criminal Thinking Processes. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 4 page paper. The theory of a criminal thinking style or criminal thinking processes has been accepted for more than three decades. Several theorists offered new theories by the mid-1970s that focused on cognitive processing. Specifically, researchers identified thinking patterns of most criminals that held true across types of crimes. This paper explains the thinking errors of criminals as identified and validated by researchers and that led to psychological assessments of criminal thinking. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: ME12_PG689938.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
processing. Specifically, researchers identified thinking patterns of most criminals that held true across types of crimes. This paper explains the thinking errors of criminals as identified and validated by researchers
and that led to psychological assessments of criminal thinking. There are specific thought processes that are associated with individuals who commit crimes. Theorists refer to these patterns as thinking errors
or cognitive errors. The essay concludes there is little controversy regarding the existence of criminal thought patterns but there are other factors that need to be considered. Criminal
Thinking There does not seem to be much controversy regarding the existence of criminal thinking styles or patterns. In 1976, Yochelson and Samenow identified a number of thinking patterns associated
with the criminal mind (Clark, 2011; Henderson, 2004; Porras, 2009). They arrived at their scale following 16 years of research. Their work challenged the traditional and historical sociological theories regarding
crime and why individuals commit crimes (Henderson, 2004). The result of Yochelson and Samenows research was the Criminal Personality Theory and The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS)
(Porras, 2009). The originators identified specific cognitive patterns that were associated with criminal behavior: super-optimism, which means they think they can achieve unrealistic desires; nullification or neutralization; cognitive
indolence which refers to a desire to take the easiest path; cutoff of the ability to eliminate feelings of fear; power orientation or how the criminal perceives the level of
control they have in life; and entitlement or feelings of ownership or uniqueness; a get rich mindset; discontinuity which means they fail to follow through on their intentions (Clark, 2011;
Porras, 2009). These are all viewed to be cognitive errors. Others adapted these original scales and devised new ones, such as the Texas Christian University Criminal Thinking Scales (TCU CTS,
...