Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Criminal Profiling. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 12 page research report that utilizes scholarly literature on this topic to demonstrate the legitimacy of the position that, while criminal profiling is not always 100 percent accurate, it is a legitimate and valuable tool for law enforcement officers. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
Page Count:
12 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_khcpro.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
based on the behaviors exhibited in the commission of a crime" (Kocsis, 2006, p. 1). As this indicates, professionals, such as Dr. Kocsis do subscribe to the premise that there
are aspects of a crime scene that reflect the offenders personality. The following research paper will utilize scholarly literature on this topic to demonstrate the legitimacy of this position and
that, while criminal profiling is not always 100 percent accurate, it is a legitimate and valuable tool for law enforcement officers. One of the first points that Kocsis (2006)
makes in this text on this topic is that criminal profiling is not synonymous with racial profiling, with the latter term referring to "aggregate demographic templates" that give a collective
description of the "type of individual who is believed certain types of crime" (Kocsis, 2006, p. 2). In other words, criminal profiling refers to a description or profile that
emerges out of the evidence of an ongoing investigation and is designed to lead law enforcement agents to one specific offender. Racial profiling is a general aggregate template, which is
relied on by "customs services or casinos" or others that is used to identify individuals who may be a "likely drug trafficker or card-counting gambler" (Kocsis, 2006, p. 2).
Many people in the law enforcement community regard criminal profiling as a useful and accurate tool as the use of this strategy has significantly increased over the last several
decades. However, there are voices of dissent who point out that there is very little empirical evidence that supports the use of criminal profiling. Also, there is opposition from the
public regarding this strategy, particularly when it is erroneously confused with racial profiling. On the other hand, there is also the popular misconception among the public that criminal proofing is
...