Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Criminal Law and Procedure 3. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 9 page paper addressing legal cases in alcohol use and building safety inspection, and providing briefs of three state and federal cases: Montana v. Egelhoff, People v. Larry Ribowsky and Swindall v. Cox Enterprises, Inc. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
9 pages (~225 words per page)
File: CC6_KScrimLawProc3.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Jerry appears to have admitted driving to the mall parking lot after having too much to drink. There is no evidence that the police are certain that
Jerrys blood alcohol level is above legal limits. Without testing his blood alcohol level at the time, no one can be certain that Jerry broke any alcohol-related laws at
all. If Jerry was tested at the time of his arrest and was found to have a blood alcohol level above legal limits,
then he should have been arrested for DWI as he admits driving to the mall. If he qualified as DWI at the time of arrest, it is certain he
did while he was driving. If it is clear he broke that law, then searching his car was a legitimate act. On
the other hand, the place of "too much" means different things to different people. If Jerry was only an occasional drinker, his definition of "too much" may be well
under legal limits. If Jerry is a frequent drinker, then "too much" probably was just that. If there was no real reason for searching Jerrys car, then the
discovery of marijuana inside it was made under false assumptions and a search that should not have occurred without Jerrys explicit permission. Jerrys
attorney certainly should make use of the "what ifs" that appear to exist in Jerrys case. If the charge of DWI resulted from a hunch rather than quantitative data,
then Jerry likely should not have been charged. It is too late to test Jerry for alcohol, but if he truly is not a marijuana user then a test
...