Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Criminal Justice System: Austria And The United States. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. The differences between Austria and America's criminal justice systems were not always so broad; in fact, there was a time when both mirrored a decidedly punitive approach when it came to criminal justice. Coupled with Austria's conservative nature, this particular stance was neither popular nor productive; as such, a trend began taking place throughout the 1980s and 1990s that incorporated a more mediation-minded position to addressing the perpetual nature of criminal activity. Compared with this newfangled victim-offender mediation, the United States continues to utilize harsh and unrelenting tactics when it comes to its overall approach to criminal justice. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCCrmJs.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
to criminal justice. Coupled with Austrias conservative nature, this particular stance was neither popular nor productive. As such, a trend began taking place throughout the 1980s and 1990s
that incorporated a more mediation-minded position to addressing the perpetual nature of criminal activity. Compared with this newfangled victim-offender mediation, the United States continues to utilize harsh and unrelenting
tactics when it comes to its overall approach to criminal justice. Austrias motivation for instituting a mediation stance was born out of concern for its juvenile justice, which sought to
address this particular group of offenders with alternative means other than outright punishment. One of the primary objectives of this heretofore-uncharted territory was to involve juvenile offenders in conflict
resolution that may include victim-offender mediation, comprehensive compensation and reconciliation, along with community service (Pelikan, 2002). Inclusive of these atypical arrangements were the passage of new legislation, modified administrative
arrangements and probationary programs. The results were so positive that the format was soon introduced into other groups that included adult offenders, an approach that was both time and
effort intensive. Indeed, this scheme was neither flawless nor without its outspoken opposition. Conservatives and the womens movement did not appreciate the manner by which offenders were being sidelined
from real punishment; however, their collective voices were not strong enough to defeat legislation, which set a precedence for the Austrian criminal justice system to promote a new and previously
underutilized mediation process. By employing such restorative alternatives, myriad cases have been satisfactorily approached; however, there is some concern that this victim-offender mediation process might turn into nothing short
of a diversionary practice in a more substantial criminal justice system, rather than progressing into a truly restorative alternative (Pelikan, 2002). In America,
...