Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Crime Prevention at the Federal Level. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 4 page paper takes a look at the controversy over whether laws at the federal level really help local law enforcement. Several issues are addressed. Hate crime legislation is discussed. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA318fed.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
officials and state budgets or with the federal government. There is local law, procedures within police departments and and so forth. Then there is the federal government that is often
pressured into waging war on crime. While many contend that crime control is really the province of local police departments and state troopers, federal law has made a difference. To
that end, there have been some major federal anti-crime laws to crop up during the past fifteen years that have had an impact on the way in which law enforcement
is carried out. There are general laws that perhaps help local police departments through legislation to increase funding and then there are ideological laws such as hate crime legislation and
all of these have made a difference. Each is controversial, and compared with state and local law, they may not make much difference. After all, legislation like Megans Law and
three strikes laws are state laws as are rules regarding punishment, inclusive of the death penalty. It seems as if state law and local enforcement is more powerful than federal
law in this area. However, there are two sides to the story. In 1997, Quist explains that the House had been attempting to finalize legislation regarding federal aid as
well as a number of local anti-crime programs (5). The appropriations bill in question included $523 million for Local Law Enforcement as well as $1.4 billion for Community Oriented
Policing Services (5). Such federal legislation can provide a large boost for local police departments. Another important time was just a few years previously. In 1994, Bill Clinton signed a
$30.2 billion crime bill (Idelson and Masci 3526). This was responsible for enacting a dramatic commitment for federal involvement in violent crime prevention as well as prosecution
...