Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Comparison Paper: Kierkegaard and Gonzalez. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages. This paper is a comparison between the works of Soren Kierkegaard and Justo L. Gonzalez. Topics within the paper will include the two schools of thought of Kierkegaard and Gonzalez, and the highly interpretational opinions of these men as it considers their God. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_JAskierk.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
schools of thought of Kierkegaard and Gonzalez, and the highly interpretational opinions of these men as it considers their God. KIERKEGAARD AND GONZALEZ Kierkegaard has been called the father
of existentialism, inasmuch as his views were wrapped up in the notion that humanity is its own opposing force. To be unique within a world of sameness is a
quest sought by many people; however, it is by way of such an objective that one becomes labeled as selfish and intolerant of commonly accepted methods. This negative connotation
of individualism - which is to maintain an independence from the norm - has cast an even darker meaning upon the essence of faith and how it attempts to control
ones very existence. Believing that man is a selfish being who has limitless desires, and noting that there exists no common denominator between humanity and the rest of nature,
Kierkegaards implication acknowledges that mankind stands alone in his endless quest for more, a concept the philosopher considered to be one of the primary reasons society is its own opposing
force. Kierkegaard was intensely interested in the sanctity of the individual apart from the influence of faith, believing with his heart and soul that each person in society holds
his or her own singular importance. "The ethical is the universal, and as such it is again the divine. One has therefore a right to say that fundamentally every
duty is a duty toward God; but if one cannot say more, then one affirms at the same time that properly I have no duty toward God. Duty becomes
duty by being referred to God, but in duty itself I do not come into relation with God. Thus it is a duty to love ones neighbor, but in
...