Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Combating Terrorism. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 6 page brief to the President. In combating terrorism in the wake of the September 11 attacks, the recommendation is that the administration maintain its current track on security while still encouraging business as usual, all the while balancing with continual assessment of Americans' liberties. It is for these that we are most hated, and we must ensure that citizens' liberties remain. Efforts to preserve citizens' liberties need to include tight protectionism of borders (not of business) and the unmistakable message that noncitizens will be scrutinized for no reason other than the fact that they are not citizens and so have no vested in preserving the freedoms that are so uniquely American. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: CC6_KSterrorPres.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
the President of the United States on a solution to domestic terrorism. There have been isolated occurrences of terrorism in the United States for decades, but we have typically
sought to identify and address the root problem sources rather than respond directly to the symptoms of terrorism. The events of September 11 and subsequent anthrax mailings have served
to demonstrate that the United States must also guard against the symptoms of the disease, as well as its causative organisms. Certainly the causes must be addressed in due
time; the focus at present needs to be the expression of terrorism. Todays Changes With
the exception of the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center, the terrorism we typically have experienced within the United States has not been labeled as such. The Oklahoma
City bombing, the Littleton shootings and other shocking, heinous acts that have taken place within our country (Madden, 2001) at the hands of our own citizens have equated to a
form of terrorism very much like that which bin Laden and his associates worked upon the United States on September 11. The primary difference lies in (1) who commits
the acts and (2) why they commit the acts. It was one of our own citizens who planned and executed the Oklahoma City
bombing. That fact of the case caused it to be referred to as a crime, but not as terrorism. Had the same act been undertaken by those known
to be dedicated to committing terrorism, then the bombing would have carried that name instead (Begley, 2001). The reasons that these criminals -
...