Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Clinton's Success In 1992 -- Political, Social & Economic Factors. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 40 page paper that provides an overview of the basic elements that impacted the Clinton candidacy in 1992 and provided a win for Clinton even in light of controversy, questions of ethics, and the presence of Ross Perot. Bibliography lists 35 sources.
Page Count:
40 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_1992cl.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
and the forceful third party candidate, Ross Perot, who dropped out of the race and then reentered, creating speculation that his involvement could have cost been the defining element that
cost Bush the election. Other factors like efforts by the candidates to improve voter turnout and the use of town-hall meeting to bring politics into a local perspective were
also elements that impacted the election process. (Anonymous 190). By the end, Clintons win was anything but unexpected, but it was the overwhelming success in 1992 that was
somewhat surprising in light of claims against his character, challenges to the essence of his campaign ideologies, and a level of dissatisfaction in standard government processes that was marked by
the entrance and relative success of third party candidate Ross Perot. It has been argued that the political environment of the era preceding the election as well as public
perceptions regarding the ineffectiveness of the Republican leadership under Bush marked the trail for Clintons success. At the same time, arguments have also been made that Bushs popularity at
the onset of the campaign was also a defining factor in creating the sense of immediacy in the campaign that led to a struggle to the end. But even
in light of these factors, Clinton had to distinguish himself against the challenges of Bushs stability and Perots effective and challenging campaign presence. A part of this necessary
delineation for the Clinton camp was actually to distinguish Clinton as a social democrat, but one with economic responsibility. The nature of his campaign promises demonstrated the necessity for
combining his leftist-leanings in terms of health care and welfare, and mixed with a commitment to maintaining economic stability (Meyerson 421). The notion that the two elements could be
...