Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Classical Liberalism and Radicalism
. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
                                            
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper briefly discusses the differences between Classical Liberalism and Radicalism, and argues that Radicalism is a more sensible political philosophy. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
                                                
Page Count: 
                                                3 pages (~225 words per page)
                                            
 
                                            
                                                File: D0_HVradlib.rtf
                                            
                                            Buy This Term Paper »
                                          
                                             
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
                                                    
                                                
                                                    version of Radicalism; most Radicals would say that Liberals have lost their passion. Classical Liberalism begins in the "moral philosophy and political economy of the Scottish Enlightenment, particularly in the  
                                                
                                                    thought of Adam Smith and David Hume" (Sally). Its 20th century practitioners include Jacob Viner, Wilhelm Ropke and F.A. Hayek (Sally). The basic, core value of Liberalism is individual freedom  
                                                
                                                    (Sally). 	This definition illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of Liberalism simultaneously. On the negative side is the fact that "binding rules proscribe certain actions which interfere with the individuals delimited  
                                                
                                                    private sphere, particularly his property, in order to prevent him from being arbitrarily coerced" (Sally). In spite of this, he is still free act as he sees fit, except for  
                                                
                                                    those things that are "specifically forbidden" (Sally).  	This in an odd way also is the strength of Liberalism, because as long as he obeys the law, he is free  
                                                
                                                    to do as he pleases within its limits (Sally). A person thus acting "in his own interest" or that of his friends and family has an "inestimably vast range of  
                                                
                                                    present and future actions, allowing for the powerful expression of his individuality in all departments of life" (Sally). 	Individual freedom (i.e. Liberalism) is the "bedrock of the free market economy"  
                                                
                                                    (Sally). The theory of the free market as a cure for almost every economic ill has taken an extremely bad beating in the last weeks, but it still remains a  
                                                
                                                    model of Classic Liberalism, since the "freedom to produce and consume" leads to a division of labor that in turn leads to specialization in both occupations and geographical locations; these  
                                                
                                                    changes in turn lead to a "much improved employment and allocation of existing resources" (Sally).	 	Another strength of Classical Liberalism and the free market is that it allows people to  
                                                
                                                    ...