Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Chomsky And Language. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
7 pages in length. American Linguistics Professor Noam Chomsky argues that there is a subject matter-specific language learning faculty innately present in every individual that allows for people to grasp and utilize words. That his theory supports the claim that there are syntactic substantive parameters in language for the purpose of structuring arguments is the foundation upon which much contemporary linguistic study is based. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCChmsk.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
and utilize words. That his theory supports the claim that there are "syntactic substantive parameters in language for the purpose of structuring arguments" (Snyder, 2001, p. 324) is the
foundation upon which much contemporary linguistic study is based. When challenged by the issue of social factors, Chomsky asserts that "children learn complex language despite poor stimuli and there
must therefore exist a biological, universal grammar" (Lewin, 1999, p. 36). II. CHILDREN, LANGUAGE AND CHOMSKY For a normal child, developing language
skills is accomplished with little conscious effort; by the age of three, most children are speaking their native tongue in "fluid, grammatical sentences" (Pinker, 1994, p. 210). Scientists have
thus concluded that "specialized circuits" (p. 210) exist within the brain that assist the ability of eloquent speech. Yet, being able to speak clearly and concisely is entirely different
from possessing the ability to assemble words in the correct grammatical order. This, say experts, is a large component to whether or not language is fully learned. According
to Chomsky, however, all children have the ability to "use sentences which they had not heard before" (Pacitti, 2000, p. 18), clearly exclusionary of the need to learn how to
assemble said sentences because the language is fully learned long before children are cognizant of this realization. Contrasting to Chomskys theory is the
notion of social conditions and the need for memory with regard to learning ones own spoken tongue, as well as foreign languages. Opponents of Chomskys contend that sociological factors
are primary in whether an individual functionally learns to speak, contending that a child of poverty does not have the same foundation of learning that his counterpart does in an
...