Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Children And Moral Recognition. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. After extensive research, Piaget identified a distinct recognition between right and wrong beginning at about five years old, noting how children considered rules both "rigid and unalterable" because they were put in place by authority figures such as parents. Moreover, the fact that children at this age are challenged to comprehend others' perspectives and/or intent, which leads them to "focus more on objective outcomes than on subjective motives" (BBC/OU, 2006). Myriad components can disrupt moral development, not the least of which includes the imbalance of punishment versus reward, transcending law for a higher ethical reason (i.e. vigilantism) or the moral course (or lack thereof) established by an influential person. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCChldMoral.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
figures such as parents. Moreover, the fact that children at this age are challenged to comprehend others perspectives and/or intent, which leads them to "focus more on objective outcomes
than on subjective motives" (BBC/OU, 2006). Myriad components can disrupt moral development, not the least of which includes the imbalance of punishment versus reward, transcending law for a higher
ethical reason (i.e. vigilantism) or the moral course (or lack thereof) established by an influential person. Of course, we should be cautious about making big generalizations about cultural or
gender differences, but these arguments highlight the point that the norms and values that are prominent in a childs life need to be considered alongside any changes in the childs
cognitive development (BBC/OU, 2006). When examining why murder occurs more in some societies than others, it is important to realize how the concept of a rational society - in
which the entire community is greatly influenced by principles its members completely and accept without challenge - has indeed proven to be one of the most powerful standards of contemporary
culture. Do people uphold morality because it is the rational thing to do? And what of rationality - is that not merely a reflection of ones own self-interest?
Distinguishing these moral and ethical actions presses one to determine if the actions are right or wrong based solely upon what one is accustomed to in a given society.
Characteristic of humanitys constant quest for the concept of meaning, the journey of understanding has come to represent myriad things to myriad people,
ultimately rendering any universal explanation virtually impossible. The problem with meaning as it relates to moral right and wrong is attempting to successfully pinpoint a single yet comprehensive connotation
...