Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Child Abuse: (Neo)Conservative And (Neo)Liberal Perspectives. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. Privacy rights reside at the heart of what separates (neo)conservatives and (neo)liberals on the topic of child abuse. Given the fact that one side eschews virtually every attempt at government infiltration where personal choice is concerned and the other permits the inclusion of some government involvement in order to prevent harm, the two sides base their foundations upon the fundamental right to privacy that each individual maintains under the Constitution. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCChildAbPr.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
is concerned and the other permits the inclusion of some government involvement in order to prevent harm, the two sides base their foundations upon the fundamental right to privacy that
each individual maintains under the Constitution. I. CLASSICAL CONSERVATIVES AND LIBERALS The primary difference between classical conservatives and liberals as they both relate to child abuse can best be
illustrated by two diverse Supreme Court periods: Warren and Rehnquist. The liberal approach of the mid-twentieth century Warren era reflected a time when conservatives were coming unhinged over this
Courts objective to "restrict the role of government in regulating human behavior" (Kozlowicz et al, 1993), particularly when it pertained to personal rights. Was it up to government-mandated social
policy to intervene where such issues as child abuse were concerned when it so readily grazed the fine line of personal privacy? It has long been considered an unspoken
reality that the reigning political movement of a given time period is also the predominant influence over social welfare policy, which accurately corresponds with the manner by which the liberal
stance of Warrens era reflects a more hands-off stance when it comes to government intervention. Moreover, this fixated liberal point of view toward personal rights the Warren Court upheld
was met with great consternation by conservatives who believed the Supreme Court justice was wholly misinterpreting the Constitutions fundamental composition; only when Rehnquist entered the judicial arena were classical conservatives
once again duly represented. Kozlowicz et al (1993) note how in many ways the transition to Rehnquist from Warren was a move from one set of extreme values to
another. The origins and basics of traditional American liberalism gave direct rise to the ideals and concepts of individual political freedom and its
...