Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Charles Taylor And Negative Liberty. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
12 pages in length. Freedom – the quest for and attainment of – has long been at the heart of human existence. Since man was first aware of his autonomy as a living being, he has sought out the benefits of freedom even when that search has rendered less than advantageous results. Charles Taylor's understanding of freedom in the capacity of negative liberty and positive liberty illustrates how the idea of a self-governing society is one that poses a significant challenge to those who believe people are intrinsically able to reserve social, political and caste desires beyond the unquestionable inherent tendency toward self-directed satisfaction. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
12 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCNegLib.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
has sought out the benefits of freedom even when that search has rendered less than advantageous results. Charles Taylors understanding of freedom in the capacity of negative liberty and
positive liberty illustrates how the idea of a self-governing society is one that poses a significant challenge to those who believe people are intrinsically able to reserve social, political and
caste desires beyond the unquestionable inherent tendency toward self-directed satisfaction. II. DISCRIMINATION AMONG MOTIVATIONS & STRONG EVALUATION The extent to which certain motivational factors serve to further define negative
freedom based upon the greater or lesser importance of restrictions is both grand and far-reaching; that this discrimination among motivations is an integral component of the overall notion of freedom
speaks to the manner by which freedom is an important commodity by virtue of mans purposive existence. Taylor (1985) provides clarification of this point by noting how, therefore, the
presence of distinctions must also exist where the significance of various freedoms and their different purposes are involved. The proverbial wrench so often thrown into the mix at this
juncture is how this scenario omits the type of discrimination "which would allow us to say that someone who was doing what he wanted (in the unproblematic sense) was not
really free, the kind of discrimination which allows us to put conditions on peoples motivations necessary to their being free, and hence to second-guess them" (Taylor, 1985, pp. 211-229).
In the end, all that has been demonstrated is how discriminations are used as measurement between "more or less significant freedoms" (Taylor, 1985, pp. 211-229) as illustrated by the discriminations
among peoples purposes. Taylor (1985) acknowledges how this position has the tendency to cause a level of embarrassment where the crude negative theory is concerned, however, rectification of this faux
...