Sample Essay on:
Caymanian Status Grants by the Cabinet: Could this action be successfully challenged by way of judicial review?

Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Caymanian Status Grants by the Cabinet: Could this action be successfully challenged by way of judicial review?. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.

Essay / Research Paper Abstract

This 4 page paper considers the recent grating of status by the Cabinet in the Cayman Islands and considers whether or not this could be subject to a successful judicial review application. The bibliography cites 3 sources.

Page Count:

4 pages (~225 words per page)

File: TS14_TEcayjudr.rtf

Buy This Term Paper »

 

Unformatted sample text from the term paper:

the separation of the powers. The bodies that carryout administration are given a level of power which should not be exceeded. It appears there are currently issues regarding the Caymanian status by the Cabinet under the provisions of section 20 (d) of the Immigration Law, where there is a conflict of interests when one of those receiving the grant was also one who advised the cabinet on the legality of the status grants (Anonymous, 2004). In addition to this there are also concerns over the acceptance of the gift by so many of the judiciary, as such the Caymanian Bar Associations (CBA) has been to attempt to seek a judicial review, and the question is whether or not this will succeed. Almost any decision that is made by a judicial body, a public body or a quasi public bodies will be susceptible to judicial review. In a judicial review there is the ability for the court to consider the underling rules and regulations, along with their legality. These can include statutory instruments, orders in council as well as any other rules or regulations that have their authority originating with parliament or statute. There are grounds on which a review may be sought, this was seen in the case of Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374. The three broad categories were illegality, irrationality and procedural irregularity (Thompson, 2002). Lord Diplocks classification of illegality is the category that contains the most basic of judicial review doctrines, that of ulta vires. This means beyond (ultra) power (vires). This is an idea very basic to administrative law. Any public body will be given power to deal with their remits. This power has limits, and as such the authority has boundaries which ...

Search and Find Your Term Paper On-Line

Can't locate a sample research paper?
Try searching again:

Can't find the perfect research paper? Order a Custom Written Term Paper Now