Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Carville’s “Had Enough?” - A Review. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This is a 5 page paper that provides an overview of Carville's book, "Had Enough?". The deficiencies of the GOP are highlighted in a review of the text. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: KW60_KFpol009.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
of and participant in the Democratic Party, and as such, its no surprise that the book is in support of Democratic political ideals, but it is not merely an outline
of such ideals. Rather, the book can be viewed as something of an effort to situate those ideals in the reality of the current highly divisive political discourse. The basic
premise is that, from Carvilles view, liberals in United States political discourse are always on the defensive, apologizing for and answering to attacks that originate from conservatives; for example, justifying
why their economic policies are not "socialism", or why their foreign policy ideas would not weaken the national security of the nation. Carville posits that such a position has left
the party looking "weak" in the eyes of the nation, and that voters are more likely to elect a "strong and wrong" candidate than a weak one, even if the
weak one is right on the issues (Carville, 2010). He has written this text, then, in order to put forth the idea that liberals should be proud of their political
position and accomplishments in areas such as Social Security, Medicare, public education, regulation of financial markets, and so on, and adopt a more aggressive public stance in support of these
policies. As far as the actual subject matter dealt with in the course of the book, one should first look at the very structure which the book adopts, as this
is intimately tied to the themes of the work. In the introduction to the book, Carville invokes a number of criticisms against the GOP which all amount to the fundamental
idea that the GOP is not doing what the Constitution of the United States outlines that a government is responsible for doing (Carville, 2010). In particular, Carville cites that the
...